Cost And Time Analysis of Drainage Works Using Conventional Riverstone Method and Precast U-Ditch Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v8i1.135Keywords:
cost comparison, time, drainage, perbandingan biaya, waktu, drainaseAbstract
The aim of this research is to determine the comparison of costs and work time using the conventional river stone method and the precast u-ditch method. So from the two methods mentioned above, we can choose or compare which method can provide benefits in terms of cost and time. This research uses a quantitative method, which explains a process of finding knowledge using data in the form of numbers as a tool for analyzing information about what you want to know in a situation that is the object of study and then analyzed. Comparative analysis of costs and time for drainage channel work using the conventional method with a length of 192 meters takes 55 working days with a cost of Rp 123,617,000.0 while the precast method with a length of 174 meters takes 48 working days with a cost of Rp 78,292,000.0 . The conventional method takes 14% longer to carry out work compared to the precast method. The cost per meter of work using the conventional method is Rp 6,438,385, while work using the method is Rp 4,449,540 with a difference of Rp 1,988,845. The use of precast methods is 30% lower than conventional methods.
References
A. G. R. Andika, 2022, “Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pembangunan Saluran Drainase Menggunakan Metode Konvensional (Batu Kali) Dengan (U-Ditch) Studi kasus proyek pembangunan saluran drainase di ruas jalan Bypass Dharmagiri Gianyar”, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi Politeknik Negeri Bali Jurusan Teknik Sipil Program Studi D III.
F. Zulkarnain, dan I. Dewi, 2020, “PKM Pembuatan Saluran Drainase Dusun Ii Jln Inpres Desa Tanjung Gusta Untuk Mengatasi Banjir”, Teknik Sipil Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Vol 5, No. 1, Desember.
G. R. F. G. Wahidin, dan M. Taufiq, 2020, “Perencanaan Pembangunan Drainase di Desa Ciawi Kecamatan Banjarharjo Kabupaten Brebes,” Infratech Build. J., 52–60.
I. K. E. Wirawan, I. N. A. P. Winaya, ST. Msi., dan Y. Sukarmawati, ST. MT., 2022, “Perbandingan Produktivitas Beton Cetak U-Dicth Dengan Bius Beton”, Pengajuan Repository pada September.
Ir. R. D. H. Yusuf, ST. MSc., dan M. W. Ramadhan, 2022, “Analisis Efisiensi Biaya dan Waktu Pekerjaan Drainase Menggunakan Metode Konvensional Dengan Metode Pracetak Studi Kasus Pekerjaan Drainase Kel. Indonesiana Kota Tidore Kepulauan”, Dintek, Vol. 15, No. 1, Maret, 1-11.
J. Abda, 2021, “Tinjauan Sistem Drainase Jalan”, Orbith, Vol. 17, No. 2, 107-113.
M. L. Gustomi, M. Taufiq, A. Khamid, Imron, dan Wahidin, 2023, “Perbandingan Waktu dan Biaya Pelaksanaan Drainase Konvensional Pasangan Batu Kali dengan Beton Pracetak U-Ditch (Studi Kasus di Desa Karanganyar Kecamatan Pagerbarang Kabupaten Tegal)”, Era Sains: Journal of Science, Engineering and Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, Mei, 56-65.
R. Cainawa, “Perbandingan Metode Pelaksanaan Beton Konvensional Dengan Pra Cetak Terhadap Biaya dan Waktu (Studi Kasus: Pekerjaan Drainase Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Balikpapan-Samarinda Seksi 4)”, Fakultas Teknik Unirvesitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda.
Ruspiansyah, dan A. Maryanto, 2021, “Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pekerjaan Drainase Antara Metode Precast Dan Cast In Situ”, Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil, Vol. 5, No. 1, Juni, 28-39.
S. A. A. A. Satria, Kustamar, dan L. K. Wulandari, 2021,“Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Saluran Drainase Batu Kali Dengan Beton Readymix Dan Beton Pracetak Pada Ruas Jalan Boyolangu - Campurdarat Kabupaten Tulungagung”, of Civil Engineering Department, National Institut of Technology, Malang.
Y. W. Januardi, 2023, “Studi Perbandingan Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Beton Fc 20 Pada Proyek Jalan Antara Metode SNI dan Lapangan”, Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sarjanawiata Tamansiswa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yulianus Brechmans Dilianto, Dimas Langga Chandra Galuh, Widarto Sutrisno (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.