Teaching Critical Discourse Analysis to ELT Learners through Corpus Based Approach

Authors

  • yogi setia samsi University of Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v7i1.1814

Keywords:

Corpus Linguistics, Concordance, Critical Discourse Analysis, Learning and Teaching

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Concordance is the software that facilitates an unlimited data recognizing the frequency and collocation. It can be used for learning and teaching. This study is qualitative and aimed to know the contribution of corpus tool in teaching CDA and the students’ responses through the use of corpus tool, named concordance software, in one of the University. The method in this research is qualitative descriptive with the content analysis. Thus, I employed the frequency and collocation in order to get its sociocognitive contained into three levels of analysis: microstructure, superstructure, and macrostructure couched within critical discourse analysis framework of Van Dijk (2008) through 2 articles taken from different newspaper that has been collected into concordance software. The data can be represented to be mediator in learning and teaching CDA in the class to find out the ideology through frequency and collocation. The findings reveal that concordance has the contribution to the learning and teaching especially in linguistic course. It is questioningly proven by the students’ responses that the students seemingly motivate and enthuse to learn CDA through corpus linguistics. Concordance is effective and can help the teacher in their teaching.

References

Adel, A., & Reppen, R. (2008). Corpora and Discourse: The challenges of different Settings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Biber, D. (1998). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

----------. (2006). University Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Charles, M., Diane Peccrari, & Susan Hunston. (2009). Academic Writing: at the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus Linguistic Approaches for Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 22, 75-95.

Gerot, L. & Peter Wignell. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Queensland: AEE Publishing.

Hou, Yu. (2014). A Corpus-Based Study of Nominalization in Translations of Chinese Literary Prose. Bern: Peter Lang.

McEnery, T. & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Cheepen, C. (2006). Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Recourses Book. London: Routledge.

Swales, J.M. (2002). Integrated and Fragmented Worlds: EAP Materials and Corpus Linguistics. In J. Flowerder (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 150-164). London: Longman.

Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vyatkina, Nina. (2016). Data-Driven Learning of Collocation: Learner Performance, Proficiency, and Perceptions. Language Learning and Technology Journal, Vol 20, 3, pp. 159-179.

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis: Second Edition. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

samsi, yogi setia. (2019). Teaching Critical Discourse Analysis to ELT Learners through Corpus Based Approach. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 7(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v7i1.1814

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.