PEER-ASSESSMENT THROUGH PADLET TO EVALUATE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Authors

  • Aisyah Aisyah Jakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Ninuk Lustiyantie Jakarta State University, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fathiaty Murtadho Jakarta State University, Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Writing, Peer-assessment, Padlet

Abstract

Peer-assessment is an effective way to improve the quality of student learning. The aim of this research is to find students' perceptions of using Padlet in peer assessment in writing English language learning process. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques using questionnaires. The questionnaire used contained 10 questions to gather information regarding the perception of students regarding the use of Padlet. It is hoped that the results of this study will provide benefits in various aspects, namely, (1) theoretical benefits, this study is expected to provide a deeper understanding of the application of peer assessment with technology to learning, (2) practical benefits, and (3) for the learning process of both students and teachers. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that English is one of the most important skills for students to learn because it will greatly influence students' skills in acquiring new knowledge.

References

Anggeraini, Y., & Madenta, T. (2020). EFL LEARNERS`LEARNERS`READING HABIT AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION ENHANCEMENT THROUGH PARTNER READING. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ, 7(2), 294.

Alsadon, Hamadah. (2017). Students’ Perceptions of E-Assessment at Saudi Electronic Universit. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, volume 16, issue 1

Chang, C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2020). Effects of a mobile-based peer-assessment approach on enhancing language-learners’ oral proficiency. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1612264

Chong, S. W. (2018). Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research. In Language Assessment Quarterly (Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 330–347). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423

Chris, Corbel. (1999). Technology-enhanced Language Learning [Book Review]. TESOL in context,

Daukšaitė-Kolpakovienė, A., & Mačianskienė, N. (2023). Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations in EFL Classes: Assessors’ View. Pedagogy, 150(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2023.150.6

Dwiniasih, Sukmawati Wahidah, F., & Sis Nanda, D. (2023). ONLINE EDUCATION EVOLUTION: ENGLISH TEACHERS AND THE SCHOOLOGY SHIFT. Academic Journal PERSPECTIVE: Language, Education and Literature, 11(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.33603

Hung, Y. (2019). Bridging assessment and achievement: Repeated practice of self-assessment in college English classes in Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1584783

Indriani, L., & Estiyowati, R. (2023). ENGAGING STUDENT TEACHERS IN HYBRID COLLABORATIVE WRITING CLASS. Academic Journal PERSPECTIVE: Language, Education and Literature, 11(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.33603

Jong, B., & Hua, T. (2021, January 1). Using Padlet as a Technological Tool for Assessment of Students Writing Skills in Online Classroom Settings. http://www.conscientiabeam.com/pdf-files/art/61/IJEP20219(2)411-423.pdf

Juliana, Chau., Alfred, Lee. (2014). Technology-enhanced language learning (TeLL): An update and a principled framework for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses / L'apprentissage des langues assisté par la technologie (TeLL): mise à jour et énoncé de principes pour les cours. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. Doi: 10.21432/T2Z59T

June, Thompson. (1998). Technology enhanced language learning: a collaborative enterprise. Information Services and Use archive. Doi: 10.3233/ISU-1998-181-212

Lailiyah, L., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. L. P., Artini, L. P., Padmadewi, N. N., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Peer Assessment-based Digital Literacy, EFL Students' Reading Competency, and Engagement.Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i4.53012

Li, L., & Gao, F. (2015). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1048185

Michael, D., Bush., Robert, M., Terry. (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning.

Mina, Homayouni. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: on the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia. Doi: 10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3

Mohammad Salem Almahasneh, A., & Abdul- Hamid, S. (2019). The Effect of Using Peer Assessment Training on Writing Performance among Arab EFL High School Students in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.10

Qiyu, Sun. (2023). The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing. Frontiers in Psychology. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070618

Senger, J.-L., & Kanthan, R. (2012). Student Evaluations: Synchronous Tripod of Learning Portfolio Assessment—Self-Assessment, Peer-Assessment, Instructor-Assessment. Creative Education, 03(01), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.31025

Zheng, C., Wang, L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 806–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1946562

Yuko, Goto, Butler. (2023). Self-assessment in second language learning. Language teaching, doi: 10.1017/s0261444822000489

Yupeng, Lin., Zhonggen, Yu. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer Assessment in Online Language Courses. Languages. Doi: 10.3390/languages8010047

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Aisyah, A., Lustiyantie, N., & Murtadho, F. (2024). PEER-ASSESSMENT THROUGH PADLET TO EVALUATE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 12(1), 90–97. Retrieved from https://ejournalugj.com/index.php/Perspective/article/view/9472

Citation Check