JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TIME LIMIT FOR INVESTIGATION OF GENERAL CRIMES AGAINST THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS

Penulis

  • Alan Sahlan University of Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Agus Dimyati University of Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Sutiyono Suwondo University of Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9572

Kata Kunci:

investigation time, human rights of suspects, ius contitutum and ius constituendum

Abstrak

The phenomenon of criminal law enforcement today is increasingly losing direction and is even considered to have reached its lowest point, the justice-seeking community complains about the criminal investigation process (general) which is convoluted, protracted and there is even no end to the solution, this situation clearly does not provide legal certainty, justice and benefits in law enforcement, moreover there will be violations of the rights of suspects, one of the causes of this situation is the absence of The provisions of the investigation time limit (norm vacuum), which gives the investigator the opportunity to abuse his authority. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find out the provisions of the time limit for the investigation of general crimes related to the protection of the human rights of suspects in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and to analyze the setting of the time limit for the investigation of general crimes in the criminal procedure law that will be dated. The research method used in this study is using the type of normative legal research with the approach used in this study being the statute approach and the conceptual approach, with the research specification being descriptive analytical, while the legal material collection technique used in this study is by using document studies. namely documents obtained from the Jatanrasa Unit of the Sumber Police. Based on the results of the study, it shows that there is no provision that regulates the time limit for the investigation of the suspect from the beginning of the investigation to the transfer of the trial case, so that the status of the suspect depends on the investigation process. The absence of a time limit in the investigation of suspects causes legal uncertainty guaranteed by Articles 28D and 281 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, therefore in the Draft Criminal Code there is a regulation of the time limit for investigation as stipulated in article 48 of the RUUKUHAP. Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (3)

Referensi

Andi Hamzah, 1984, Investigation of Criminal Cases Through Technical and

Legal Facilities, Galia Indonesia, Jakarta

Abdusalam H.R, 1997, Evaluation of the Implementation of the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia,

National Police Legal Office, Second Edition, Jakarta.

Akub M. Syukuri and Baharuddin Baharu, 2012, Insights into Due Process Of Law in

the Criminal Justice System, first printing, Rengkang Education, Yogakarta

Armia, Mhd. Sidiq Tgk., 2003, Development of Thought in Law, First Edition

, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta

Atmasasmita, Romli, 1996, The Criminal Justice System PersEffective Existentialism and

Abolitionism, Print 2, Putra Abardin, Bandung

Budiardjo, Miriam, 1977, Fundamentals of Political Science, PT. Gramedia, Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, , 1992, Politics of Criminal Law, Postgraduate of the University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Barda Nawawi Arief, 2002, Flower of Potpourri

Criminal Law Policy, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Bambang Waluyo, 2011, Victimization and Witness Protection, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Dimyati, Khudzaifah, 2004, Theorization of Law, A Study on the Development of Legal Thought

in Indonesia 1945-1990, Muhamadyah University Press, first printing. Surakarta

Effendy, Marwan, 2005, The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Position and Its Function from a Legal Perspective, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

A. Utrech, Introduction to Administrative Law of the State of Indonesia, (Bandung: Faculty of Law Unpad)

LAWS & REGULATIONS

Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates. Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).

Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the Police of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law No. 14 of 1970, jo Law No. 4 of 2004jo Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Law No. 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid.

Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 12 of 2005 concerning the Ratification II of CPR. Government Regulation No. 27 of 1983 jo pp No. 58 of 2010 concerning the Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-09-22

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel