APPLICATION OF RESTITUTION CRIME IN CASES OF MOLESTATION OF MINORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9574Kata Kunci:
Restitution, Child Protection, Criminal Acts of AbuseAbstrak
The provision of restitution rights as a form of compensation to children victims of criminal acts of molestation is becoming an interesting issue related to child protection because sexual violence is a type of violence with a high number every year. In this study, the author made 2 (two) problem formulations, namely: how to apply the criminal restitution in the crime of child molestation and what are the obstacles to the implementation of the provision of restitution. This study took a verdict in 2021 regarding cases of sexual abuse that positioned children as victims. The legal research method used is normative juridical which is qualitative to obtain descriptive results. The following are the results of the research that the author has found: The provision of restitution to children victims of criminal acts of abuse is the right of children of victims of criminal acts based on Article 7A of Law Number 13 of 2006, Article 71D of Law Number 35 of 2014 and Article 3 of Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017. An application for restitution can be submitted at the time before the judgment or after the judgment has obtained permanent legal force. So that the provision of restitution to the victim's child is not fundamental. Furthermore, the author found that there was a provision of restitution in the verdict so that the defendant was burdened with the obligation to pay restitution in the amount of Rp.331,527,186.00 (three hundred and thirty-one million five hundred and twenty-seven thousand one hundred and eighty-six rupiah) to the victim's children who had applied for restitution as many as 12 restitution applications. The Panel of Judges upholds procedural principles and does not look at the aspect of child protection.
Referensi
Amiruddin, "Introduction to Legal Research Methods", (2006; PT. Raja Grafindo Persada), p. 30
Azmiati Zuliah Marlina, The Right of Restitution for Victims of
Trafficking in Persons (Bandung: PT Reflika Aditama, 2015), p. 61.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga RampaiCrime of Criminal Law, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002), pp.1-2.
Dikdik M Arief and Elisatris Gultom, The Urgency of Protecting Crime Victims
Between Norms and Reality (Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007), p. 24
Leden Marpaung, Crimes Against Morality and the Problem of Prevention, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996), p. 81
R. Soesilo, The Criminal Code (KUHP) and its Complete Comments Article by Article, (Bogor: Politeia, 1988), p. 212.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Adnandito, Ibnu Artadi, Ismayana
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.