RETURN OF STATE FINANCIAL LOSSES IN THE FORM OF COMPENSATION PAYMENTS BY CONVICTED CORRUPTION OFFENDERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v16i1.9853Kata Kunci:
State Loss, Corruption, Financial LossesAbstrak
This research aims to understand the legal policies regarding the restitution of state financial losses in the form of monetary compensation by convicted corruption offenders and to identify the efforts made by police investigators in addressing the challenges of recovering state financial losses in the form of monetary compensation by convicted corruption offenders. The method used in this research is qualitative, with a primary approach of normative juridical and supporting approaches of empirical juridical. The data sources used in this research were obtained from secondary data as the primary data and from primary data as the supporting data. Furthermore, the data were subsequently processed using qualitative methods. The research findings reveal that the classification of corruption crime penalties and fines has been regulated by Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, which has since been amended by Law No. 20 of 2001. The amount of restitution and compensation is at most equal to the value of the assets obtained from the act of corruption. If the substitute money is not paid, the offender will be punished with additional fines that do not exceed the maximum limit of the principal penalty. Therefore, the compensation for the loss of the national currency is not optimal. The amount of compensation for state losses needs to be linked with the implementation of restitution and compensation for the assets/wealth of the perpetrators. The Asset Recovery Law needs to be established as a legal framework for the recovery of assets from corruption proceeds.
Referensi
Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, PT. Pradnya Paramta, 1997
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 1996
Andi Hamzah, KUHP dan KUHAP (Rineka Cipta: Jakarta, 1996)
Bunga rampai 9 (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1987)
AS Hornby, Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, 1984
Ali Yafie, Ahkad Sukaraja, Muhammad Amin Suma, dkk
Bambang Sutiyoso & Sri Hastuti Puspitasari. (2005). Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press
Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, 2003
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, PN. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2003
Djoko Prakoso dan Agus Imunarso, 1987. Hak Asasi Tersangka dan Peranan Psikologi dalam Konteks KUHAP. Bina Aksara, Jakarta
Djoko Prakoso. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Edisi Pertama, (Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta, 1987)
Garner, Bryan A., (Ed.) Black’s Law Dictionary (Second Pocket Edition), 2003 Ismawan, Indra, 2001. Memahami Reformasi Perpajakan 2000, Penerbit PT. Elex. Media Komputindo, Jakarta
La Ode Husen. (2009). Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Pemisahan Kekuasaan. Makassar: PT. Umitoha Ukhuwah Grafika
Lamintang, P.A.F, 1997, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Lamintang, 1984. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru. Bandung
M. Natsir Asnawi, Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim, (Yogyakarta: UUI Press, 2014)
Moeljatno, 1987. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara, Jakarta
Mulyatno, Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Varia Peradilan
Majalah Hukum Tahun ke XXII No 254 Januari 2007, Ikatan Hakim Indonesia IKAHI, Jakarta, 2006
Muladi dain Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005. Teori - teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Alumni, Bandung
Muladi, 1990, Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil Indonesia di Masa Datang, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro
Mulyadi, Lilik, 2007, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Adtya Bakti
Nanda Agung Dewantoro, Masalah Kebebasan Hakim dalam Menangani Suatu Perkara Pidana (Aksara Persada: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1987)
Peter Gillies (Penyunting: Barda Nawawi Arief), Criminal Law, 1990
Prodjohamdjojo, Martiman, Memahami Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 1997)
Retnowulan dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009)
Roscoe Pound. “Introduction to the philosophy of law” dalam Romli Atmasasmita, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Cet.II, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000)
Romli Atmasasmita, 1995. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Mandar Maju, Bandung
Roeslan Salehlm. “Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana” dua pengertian dalam Hukum Pidana” (Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983)
Sholehuddin, 2002. Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
S.R Sianturi. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Cet.IV, (Jakarta: Alumni Ahaem-Peteheam, 1996)
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2002)
Sudarto, 1990/1991. Hukum Pidana 1A - 1B. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto Sutrisna, I Gusti Bagus, “Peranan Keterangan Ahli dalam Perkara Pidana (Tijauan terhadap Pasal 44 KUHP),” dalam Andi Hamzah (eid.), Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986) Steven Box, Power Crime and Mystification, 1983
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana telah diubah dan ditambah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2003 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2002 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Tedy Subrata, Markuat Markuat
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
