THE ROLE OF CLASS I SEMARANG RUPBASAN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EVIDENCE BASED ON INDONESIAN LAW NUMBER 1 OF 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v16i1.9881Kata Kunci:
Law Number 1 of 2023, Management, RUPBASANAbstrak
Evidence management is a vital part of the criminal justice system which requiring professional and accountable handling. This article explores the role of Semarang Class I RUPBASAN in managing evidence under Law Number 1 of 2023. Using an empirical juridical method, the study combines a normative review of the legal framework with field practices. Primary data were obtained from interviews with RUPBASAN officers and law enforcement officials, while secondary data came from relevant legal documents and literature. The study reveals that Semarang Class I RUPBASAN (Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara) plays a strategic role in registering, maintaining, and executing evidence, including destruction and auction based on court decisions. However, the implementation of Indonesian Law Number 1 of 2023 faces obstacles such as warehouse overcapacity, risk of evidence damage, and lack of inter-agency coordination. Recommended solutions include modernizing storage facilities, enhancing officer training, and improving collaboration with law enforcement and related agencies. Despite these challenges, the law offers an opportunity to improve transparency and accountability in evidence management.
Referensi
Admaja, T., & Mukhlis. (2019). Pelaksanaan Penyimpanan Barang Bukti dan Benda Sitaan Kendaraan Bermotor di Kepolisian (Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3(4), 699-707.
Anjali, D., & Megawati, W. (2024). Akibat Hukum Penggeledahan dan Penyitaan Barang Bukti Yang Tidak Sah dalam Pra Peradilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/PID.PRA/2020/PN TLK). UNNES Law Review, 6(3), 8005-8015.
Brown, D. K. (2011). Criminal Law’s Unfortunate Triumph Over Administrative Law. JOURNAL OF LAW, ECONOMICS & POLICY, 7(4), 658-684.
Cejie, M. S. (2022). The Principles of the Trilogy of Justice and the Principle of Aanmaning Perspectives The Binding Power of Court Decisions. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 9(2022), 287-320.
Daulay, D. K. (2023). IMPLIKASI HUKUM ATAS PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG MENGEMBALIKAN BARANG BUKTI KEPADA PENUNTUT HUKUM UNTUK DIPERGUNAKAN DALAM PERKARA LAIN YANG PERKARA TERSEBUT BELUM ADA. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2023.
Dwiputra, K. (2022). Rule of Law: A Fundamental Concept Without a Coherent Meaning. Focus Journal Law Review, 2(1), 2022.
Dempsey, R. P., Eskander, E. E., Dubljevic, V. (2023). Ethical Decision-Making in Law Enforcement: A Scoping Review. Psych 2023(5), 576–601. doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/psych5020037
Eato, Y. N. (2017). I Keabsahan Alat Bukti dan Barang Bukti pada Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 6(2), 75-82.
Eleanora, F. (2019). Implementation of State Confiscated Objects Storage House (RUPBASAN) by Law Number 8 of 1981 Concerning Law Board Law of Criminal Events (KUHAP). Tadulako Law Review, 4(1), 1-14.
Ismail, M. (2018). Telaah Terhadap Konstruksi Proses Hukum Yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(1), 99.
Juwitanto, J., Amiruddin, A., Ufran. U. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Rupbasan terhadap Benda Sitaan Negara yang Berada di Rupbasan Kelas I Mataram. Jurnal Indonesia Berdaya, 4(3), 1105-1114.
Kadir, N., & Nufus, C. (2012). Perlindungan Benda Sitaan Negara dan Barang Rampasan dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Lex Jurnalica, 9(1), 31-43.
Karakostas, A., & Zizzo, D. J. (2016). Compliance and the power of authority. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 124(2016), 67-80.
Karindra, Z. (2022). Proses Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan dan Barang Rampasan Negara. JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 24(1), 1-20.
Koto, L., & Nasrullah. (2024). The Legal Dilemma between Functional Differentiation and Dominus Litis in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. PENA JUSTISIA: MEDIA KOMUNIKASI DAN KAJIAN HUKUM, 23(2), 1934-1947.
Kurniyawan, A., & Hasanah, Y. N. (2022). Peran Rupbasan sebagai Lembaga Pengelolaan Barang Sitaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 9(2), 618-624.
Lestari, R., Trisna, N., & Effida, D. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara dalam Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan dan Barang Rampasan Hasil Tindak Pidana. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(2), 148-162.
Manuaba, I. B. M. W., & Yudharta, I. P. D. (2024). Efektivitas Penyimpanan dan Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan Negara ( Studi Kasus : RUPBASAN Kelas I Denpasar). Socio-political Communication and Policy Review, 1(4), 96-103.
Moeliono, T. (2015). Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Kritikan Terhadap Putusan MK Tentang Pra Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 22(4), 594-616.
Mokhtar, K. A. (2016). Institutions and Mechanisms for Internal Conflict Resolution: Legal and Non-Legal Means in Resolving Dispute and Attaining Justice in Malaysia. Jurnal Media Hukum 23(2), 171-185.
Nte, D., & Smith, A. (2022). The Role of The Prosecutor as Executor of Court Decision in Returning Confiscated Objects and State Spoils in Criminal Cases: Comparing Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and Thailand. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 7(1).
Priyana, P., & Gunawan, T. J., (2024). Reformulation of Asset Recovery Strategy Resulting from Corruption Crimes as an Effort to Recover State Losses. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 12(2), 421-454.
Rahman, Z. A., (2015). R Status Barang Bukti Dalam Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan Negara. Universitas Airlangga, 2015.
Ross, L. (2023). The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9:58. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.3583
Salasa, A. (2016). Penyitaan Sebagai Objek Pra Peradilan. Lex Privatum, 6(3), 82-89.
Sriwidodo, J. (2019). KAJIAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA “Teori dan Praktek”. Penerbit Kepel Press.
Stoykova, R. (2023). The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence rules in criminal investigations. Journal of Computer Law & Security Review, 49(2023), 1-26.
Sukardi, S., & Purnama, H. R. (2022). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PRINCIPLES IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA. JILS (JOURNAL of INDONESIAN LEGAL STUDIES), 7(1), 156-190.
Susetyo, H. (2019). Human Rights Regime: Between Universality and Cultural Relativism, An Indonesian Experience. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 16(2), 191-209.
Zikry, I. (2023). Notes on the Law which Qualifies “Barang Bukti” as Legal Evidence. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Apriansyah Wibowo, Muhammad Riziq Aji Haidar, Dimas Andrianto Kusuma, Alif Farhan, Geraldo Virasakti A.S, Nikola Andika S
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal HUKUM RESPONSIF the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
