IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HANDLING THE CRIME OF CORRUPTION COVID-19 AID FUND

Authors

  • Putu Ari Sanjaya Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Zulkarnein Koto Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Marsudin Nainggolan Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i2.7460

Abstract

The implementation of restorative justice (restorative justice) in the handling of corruption in the Covid-19 aid fund contained in Decision Number 8/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst with the Defendant Harry Van Sidabukke, it can be seen that the panel of judges did not apply the concept of restorative justice. Because in its order, the Panel of Judges instead imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) years on the Defendant. This means that the sanctions imposed by the judge still adopt the concept of retributive justice which focuses more on retaliation. The retaliation is manifested in the form of sentencing the Defendant. In addition, regarding the implementation of restorative justice in handling corruption cases of Covid-19 aid funds that need to be developed in Indonesian law enforcement, it is related to the provision of sanctions for the Defendant to focus more on recovering losses to state finances instead of focusing on retaliation. That is, in this case the application of the concept of restorative justice needs to be considered by the Panel of Judges so that the return of state losses becomes the main crime, not an additional crime. Because in the context of law enforcement in Indonesia, the restorative justice approach for corruption cases, both small-scale corruption and those that cause harm to state finances, has so far not been implemented. This is because the legal basis for the application of restorative justice for corruption cases in the internal prosecutor's office is not sufficient. This is because the current Attorney General's Regulation does not regulate corruption as a case that can be resolved through restorative justice.

Author Biography

Putu Ari Sanjaya, Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta

Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta

References

Buku

Barany, L.J., Simanjuntak (et.al), “Bantuan sosial ekonomi di Tengah pandemic Covid-19: sudahkah Menjaring Sesuai Sasaran?†CSIS Commentaries ECON-002-ID, 2020.

Budi Suharianto, Restorative Justice dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara, Badan Penerbit Kemenkumham, Jakarta, 2016.

C.S.T. Kansil dan Christine S.T. Kansil, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana – Hukum Pidana Untuk Tiap Orang, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2007.

Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Hukum Pidana Untaian Pemikiran, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2016.

Luhut MP Pangaribuan, , Lay Judges & Hakim Ad Hoc: Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta, 2009.

Jurnal

Henny Saida Flora, “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dan Pengaruhnya dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Ubelaj, Volume 3, Issue 2, 2018.

Nasruddin, R., dan Haq, I., “Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) dan masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendahâ€, Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-I, Volume 7, Nomor 7, Juli 2020.

Wuryandani, D., “Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia 2020 dan Solusinya. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategisâ€. Jurnal Ekonomi, Volume XII, Nomor 15, Agustus 2020.

Yusona Piadi, “Implementasi Restoratif Justice dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€, Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Volume 1, Nomor 1, 2019.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif

Published

2022-08-31

Citation Check