TREATMENT OF FATE IN SHAKESPEAREAN AND CLASSICAL GREEK TRAGEDIES: A COMPARISON

Authors

  • Takad Ahmed Chowdhury Department of English University of Asia Pacific Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v8i1.3378

Keywords:

Fate, Free Will, Classical Greek Tragedy, Shakespearean Tragedy, Tragic hero.

Abstract

Fate is regarded as a central component in tragedy. The significant role of fate is recognized when, despite a character's heroic acts and good intentions, they face death simply because they are doomed to die. But studies confirm that fate does not play a similarly critical role in the tragic denouement of each play. This paper attempts a critical comparison on the role and nature of fate in the downfall of protagonists in the classical Greek and Shakespearean tragedies. By reviewing research-based articles and books, and by reading through selected texts in reader-response approach, this paper attempts to identify the entirely different natures of fate that came into play for the tragic heroes’ downfall as portrayed in these two different ages. The findings manifest that the force behind the collapse of the heroes in the classical Greek tragedies was predominantly fate where the hero had little to do but to become a pawn in the hands of external forces beyond his control, while the force behind the tragic events is not external in the Shakespearean tragedies. Rather, the heroes themselves were, on the whole, responsible for their tragic downfalls due to their internal triggers.

Author Biography

Takad Ahmed Chowdhury, Department of English University of Asia Pacific Bangladesh

Takad Ahmed Chowdhury is currently doing his Ph.D. at the School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia. He is an Associate Professor at the University of Asia Pacific (UAP), Bangladesh (now on study leave). His research interests focus on education psychology, education planning, curriculum development, ESL/EFL writing, and English literature. His ORCID ID is https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-0785 and google scholar profile is https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=eK3Z0K4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao.

References

Adade-Yeboah, A., Ahenkora, K., & Amankwah A. S. (2012). The Tragic Hero of the Classical Period. English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (3), 15-16. Doi: 10.5539/ells.v2n3p10

Al-Janaby, H. A. K. (2017). Thematic Elements of Murder in Some Plays of William Shakespeare (Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science and Technology).

Anttila, R. (2019). Analogy (Vol. 10). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Agard, W. R. (1933). Fate and Freedom in Greek Tragedy. The Classical Journal, 29(2), 117-126.

Au, E. W., & Savani, K. (2019). Can We Benefit from Believing in Fate? The Belief in Negotiating with Fate when Faced with Constraints. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2354.

Bond, E. (2013). Saved. A&C Black.

Bradly, A. C., & Brown, J. R. (1905). Shakespearean tragedy: lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth.

Bulman, J. C. (1985). The heroic idiom of Shakespearean tragedy. University of Delaware Press.

Burrill, E. W. (1920). Heredity as Fate in Greek and Elizabethan Drama. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 19(4), 486-509.

Bushnell, R. W. (2019). Prophesying tragedy: sign and voice in Sophocles' Theban plays. Cornell University Press.

Galton, F. (1898). A diagram of heredity. Nature, 57(1474), 293-293.

Garcia Landa, J. A. (1993). Theories of Interpretation: Classical to Romantic Hermeneutics. Available at SSRN 2553692.

Grady, H. (2014). The Modernity of Western Tragedy: Genealogy of a Developing Anachronism. PMLA, 129(4), 790-798.

Hamilton, E. (2017). Mythology: Timeless tales of gods and heroes. Hachette UK.

Harrop, S. (2018). Greek Tragedy, Agonistic Space, and Contemporary Performance. New Theatre Quarterly, 34(2), 99-114.

Homer. (1998). The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin Group Inc. Print.

Johnson, S. (1765). Preface to 'The Plays of William Shakespeare'.

Lipton, B. H. (2010). The biology of belief: Unleashing the power of consciousness, matter and miracles.

Mart, C. T. (2019). Reader-response theory and literature discussions: A Springboard for exploring literary texts. Stanisław Juszczyk, 78.

McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., & Johnson, D. D. (2009). Monoamine oxidase a gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2118-2123.

McEvoy, S. (2016). Tragedy: The Basics. Taylor & Francis.

Merriam-Webster, D. (2018). America's most-trusted online dictionary. (2018). Available at: www.merriam-webster.com/. Accessed January, 20.

Nurfaidah, S. (2018). Three attitudes of a reflective teacher. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 1(1), 39-48.

Phillips, A. (2016). EXPLOITING TRAGEDY. Lacan's Return to Antiquity: Between nature and the gods, 125.

Rosenblatt, L.M. (1995). Literature as Exploration. New York: MLA.

Rubio, D. (2018). God meets Satans Apple: the paradox of creation. Philosophical Studies, 175(12), 2987-3004.

Safran, M. E. (2017). Greek Tragedy as Theater in Screenâ€Media. A Companion to Ancient Greece and Rome on Screen, 187.

Shakespeare, W. (1890). The Works of William Shakespeare: General introduction and life of Shakespeare, by Edward Dowden. Hamlet. King Henry VIII. Pericles. Poems (Vol. 8). Blackie & son.

Susanto, S. (2020). The Correlation of Death, Genocide and Extinction in Jonathan Schell The Fate of the Earth.

Watson, G. J. (2017). Drama: an introduction. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278-288

Downloads

Published

2020-05-27

How to Cite

Chowdhury, T. A. (2020). TREATMENT OF FATE IN SHAKESPEAREAN AND CLASSICAL GREEK TRAGEDIES: A COMPARISON. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 8(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v8i1.3378

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)