INDIRECT WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK (WCF) IN TEACHING WRITING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v8i1.3398Keywords:
Indirect WCF, Writing, Linguistic ErrorsAbstract
Indirect Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) is a type of feedback on linguistic errors without giving the correct target form. This type of feedback is recommended under the consideration that teachers are not editors, but facilitators who provide hints to assist students work on their own text. This research investigated the students’ affective reactions toward indirect WCF in the process of learning writing. It was also purposed to investigate its impact on students’ writing quality. The subject of the research was the first-year students of English Study Program. The method of the research was descriptive qualitative. The instruments of interview and writing assignment were deployed as the data. It was found there were positive affective reactions toward the implementation of Indirect WCF. Students thought that it was useful, helpful, motivating, corrective, and informative. Nevertheless, a few students felt that the time given was too short and demanded for more accurate and clear correction codes. It was also found that Indirect WCF helped the participant students gain better quality of their paragraph writing indicated in the significant reducing number of errors after receiving feedback. Though the most types of linguistic errors were found in the case of tenses, students were able to minimize those errors into a few.
References
References
Algeo, John. 2015. Grammar: A Contemporary View Of What Should Be Taught. James Cook University. SAGE Publication.
Awada, Ghada. (2016). Effect of WhatsApp on critique writing proficiency and perceptions toward learning. ISSN: (Print) 2331-186X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/oaed20. Cogen Education.
Behera, D. K. (2013). M-Learning: A New Paradigm. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(4), 24-34.
Boardman, Cynthia A. & Jia Frydenberg. 2002. Writing to Communicate: Paragraph and Essays Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cresswell. 2005. Fundamental of Research Methodology and Statistics. New Delhi: New Age International Publisher.
Decarrio, J. S. 2001. Vocabulary Learning and Teaching. In Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, edited by Marlanne Celce-Murcia. Boston: Thomson Learning, Inc.
Dunsmuir, Sandra & Kyriacou, Maria.2013. An evaluation of the Writing Assessment Measure (WAM) for children’s narrative writing. Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way,London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. Elsevier.
Hanisi, A. L., Risdiany, R., Utami, Y. D., & Sulisworo, D. (2018). The use of WhatsApp in collaborative learning to improve English teaching and learning process. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 7(1), 29-35.
Hansman, Catherine& Wilson, Arthur.2015. Teaching Writing in Community Colleges: A Situated View of How Adults Learn to Write in Computer-Based Writing Classrooms. Journal Community College Review Volume 26, No. 1. SAGE Publication.
Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Huisman,Bart&Saab,Nadira.2018. The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 44, 2019 - Issue 6. Taylor&Francis Online.
Kukulska H., Pettit J., Bradley L., A. Carvalho., Herrington A., Kennedy D., & Walker A. 2011. Mature Students Using Mobile Devices in Life and Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (January-March 2011) (pp. 18-52)
Lahanisi, Ajid. 2018. The use of WhatsApp in collaborative learning to improve English teaching and learning process. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology 2018 Volume 7 Number 1, 29-35.
Liu, Xiaoling.2018. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 733-741, July 2018.
Maharrey, R. 2012. Should Student Learning Journals Be Assessed?. Journal of Assessment on Writing, 33 (8), 287-296.
Meyers, A. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences, Paragraphs and Essays. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Nassuora, A. B. (2013). Students Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Leaning Management Systems, 1(1), 1-9.
Olshtain, E. 2001. Functional Tasks for Mastering the Mechanics of Writing and Going Just Beyond. In Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, edited by Marlanne Celce-Murcia. Boston: Thomson Learning, Inc.
Panahi,Parva&Birjadi Parviz.2013 Toward a sociocultural approach to feedback provision in L2 writing classrooms: the alignment of dynamic assessment and teacher error feedback. Journal Language Testing in Asia. 29 May 2013. Springer Open.
Polette, Keith.2012. Teaching Grammar Through Writing, 2nd Edition (Boston, MA: Pearson Education), 162 pp. ISBN 978-0-13-256599-8.SAGE.
Richards, J. & Willy A. Renandya. 2001. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Truax, Megan L.2017. The Impact of Teacher Language and Growth Mindset Feedback on Writing Motivation. ISSN: 1938-8071 (Print) 1938-8063 (Online) Journal homepage. Routledge. Francis&Taylor.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the works' authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
- Authors should submit the signed copyright transfer agreement form (CTA Form) along with the checked (and corrected proofs).