PEER FEEDBACK ON STUDENT TEACHERS’ TEACHING PRACTICE THROUGH MICROBLOGGING WITH INSTAGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v10i2.7232Keywords:
Peer feedback, micro blogging, Instagram, teaching practiceAbstract
Technology integration in foreign language classroom is a prerequisite in this post pandemic era. Social media technologies have a great promise to boost efficacy of language learning and students’ engagement. As one of the social media platforms, Instagram rapidly gained popularity, with one billion registered users in 2018 and it is still growing bigger today. It introduced hashtags to help users discover both photos and each other. As student teachers of English, teaching skill is a big must. In teaching practice, the learning engagement is reflected by giving peer feedback. Creative and innovative peer feedback can encourage the student teachers’ professional development as a teacher. Therefore, this study sheds light on the use of Instagram as the media for giving student teachers peer feedback after they have teaching practice in the form of microblog by using carousel photos and hashtag in Instagram. Thus, qualitative method is chosen to capture the objective of the study by questionnaire, documentation and semi-structured interview. The finding of this study is expected to provide new insight to develop engagement especially in giving feedback in the teaching practice for EFL student teachers in this hybrid learning.
References
Bernard, R. M., E. Borokhovski, R. Schmid, R. Tamim, and P. Abrami. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Blended Learning and Technology use in Higher Education: From the General to the Applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 26 (1): 87–122. doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3.
Carless, D. (2020). From Teacher Transmission of Information to Student Feedback Literacy: Activating the Learner Role in Feedback Processes. Active Learning in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1177/1469787420945845.
Chalmers, Denise, and Lynne Hunt. (2016). Evaluation of Teaching, HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 3, 25–55.
Crisp, G., R. Sadler, K. Krause, M. Buckridge, S. Wills, C. Brown, J. McLean, H. Dalton, K. Lievre, and B. Brougham. (2009). Peer Review of Teaching for Promotion Purposes: Final Project Report Part 2: Appendices. In edited by Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Debulaela, P. (2013). Students’ Attitude Toward Peer Feedback in Micro Teaching Class. Thesis. UKSW.
Demirbilek, M. (2015). Social Media and Peer Feedback: What do Students Really Think about Using Wiki and Facebook as Platforms for Peer Feedback? Active Learning in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1177/1469787415589530.
Filius, R. M., R. A. M. de Kleijn, S. G. uijl, F. J. Prins, H. V. M. van Rijen, and D. E. Grobbee. 2018. Strengthening Dialogic Peer Feedback Aiming for Deep Learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education,125: 86–100. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004.
Harrison, R., Meyer, L., Rawstorne, P., Razee, H., Chitkara, U., Mears, S., & Balasooriya, C., (2020). Evaluating and Enhancing Quality in Higher Education Teaching Practice: A Meta-review, Studies in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1730315.
Hidayah, N. and Indriani, L. (2021). Real-Time Feedback in English Microteaching Practice: A Case Study on Online Learning. Metathesis: Journal of English Language Literature And Teaching. Vol. 5. No. 2, p. 155-167. DOI: 10.31002/metathesis.v5i2.4004
Lu, Jingyan and Law, Nancy. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science. 40:257–275. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2.
McKenzie, J. A., and N. J. Parker. (2011). Peer Review in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Miao, P., Pawan, F., & Fan, W. (2017). Teacher Training and Professional Development of Chinese English Language Teachers. Routledge.
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401.
Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. (2011). Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement. Studies in Higher Education. 36 (8): 879–896.
Rahimi, M. (2015). The Impact of a Learning Management System on Student Evaluation of Teaching: The difference between pre and in-service EFL teachers. Handbook of Research on Individual Differences in Computer-Assisted Language Learning.
Sharpe, R., and H. Beetham. (2010). Understanding Students’ Uses of Technology for Learning: Towards Creative Appropriation. In Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners Are Shaping Their Own Experiences, edited by R. Sharpe, H. Beetham and S. de Freitas, 85–99. Abingdon: Routledge.
Spanjers, I. A. E., K. D. Könings, J. Leppink, D. M. L. Verstegen, N. de Jong, K. Czabanowska, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer. (2015). The Promised Land of Blended Learning: Quizzes as a Moderator. Educational Research Review. 15: 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001.
Liu, Q., W. Peng, F. Zhang, R. Hu, Y. Li, and W. Yan. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18 (1): e2. doi:10.2196/jmir.4807.
Lomer, S. & Palmer, E. (2021). I didn’t know this was actually stuff that could help us, with actually learning: student perceptions of Active Blended Learning. Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1852202
Okumuş, K. & Yurdakal, I.H. (2016). Peer Feedback through SNSs (Social Networking Sites): Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about Using Facebook for Peer Feedback on Microteachings. Elementary Education Online, 2016; 15(4): 1206-1216. DOI: 10.17051/io.2016.17666.
Thomas, Susan, Qiu Ting Chie, Mathew Abraham, Sony Jalarajan Raj, and Loo-See Beh. (2014). A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework, Review of Educational Research, 84 (1), 112–59.
Wood, J., (2021). Making Peer Feedback Work: The Contribution of Technology-Mediated Dialogic Peer Feedback to Feedback Uptake and Literacy, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544.
Zhang, L. (2013). Mobile Phone Technology Engagement in EFL Classroom. International Conference on Software and Computer Science (ICSECS) (2013): p.171.
Zhu, Q., and D. Carless. (2018). Dialogue within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning. Higher Education Research & Development,37 (4), 883–897. DOI:10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CcZB1E6vI31/ (Retrieved 24 May 2022)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the works' authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
- Authors should submit the signed copyright transfer agreement form (CTA Form) along with the checked (and corrected proofs).
