STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD THE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE MULTILITERACIES COMPETENCE IN EFL CLASSROOMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i2.3470Keywords:
English, integrated, multiliteracies, perspectives, technologyAbstract
References
Anggraeni, A., Rachmijati, C., & Apriliyanti, D. L. (2020). VLOG: A TOOL FOR STUDENTS’SPEAKING PRACTICE ENHANCEMENT. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(1), 23-31.
Anstey, M. and Bull, G. (2018). Foundation of Multiliteracies. New York: Routledge
Bean, T. and Harper, H. (2011). The context of English language arts learning: The high school years. In Diane Lapp, & Douglas Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, 60-68. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2006). From literacy to “multiliteraciesâ€: Learning to mean in the new communications environment. English Studies in Africa, 49(1), 23–45. doi:10.1080/ 00138390608691342
Creswell, J., and Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Golonka, E. M. Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M. Richardson, D. L. and Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.
Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. 2011. Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication tech- nologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333.
Mills, K. A. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103-116.
Misdi, N., Kusriandi, W., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). Impact of ICT-assisted thesis writing on Student researchers’ psychological empowerment: Indonesian case. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1477, p. 042063).
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social future, 9-37. New York: Routledge
Sari, V. D. A. (2019). Z GENERATION TOWARDS THE USE OF SMARTPHONE APPLICATION FOR LISTENING ACTIVITIES IN BLENDED-LEARNING. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 2(3), 196-206.
Strickland, B. and O’Brien, M. G. (2013). A review of the literature on technology in second and foreign language learning. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yaq7dagt
Tour, E. (2015). Digital mindsets: Teachers’ technology use in personal life and teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 124–139.
Tsai, S. C. (2013). Integrating English for specific purposes courseware into task-based learning in a context of preparing for international trade fairs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 111–127.
Wang, L. and Coleman, J. A. (2009). A survey of internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education in China. ReCALL, 21, 113–129.
Walsh, M. (2009). In Pedagogic Potentials of Multimodal Literacy. In L. Tan Wee Hin & R. Subramanian (Eds), Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and Challenges, (pp. 32–47) US: IGI Global.
Zou, B. (2013). Teachers’ support in using computers for developing students’ listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 83–99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.