STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD THE ENACTMENT OF METACOGNITIVE INSTRUCTION IN AN EFL WRITING CLASS: LESSON LEARNED FROM A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY IN INDONESIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i3.4105

Keywords:

metcognitive instruction

Abstract

Metacognition plays an important role in developing EFL students to become successful learners who are able to plan their learning goals, monitor their learning progress, and evaluate their learning outcomes in the disruption era. Because of the crucial role of metacognition in language learning, the implementation of metacognitive instruction in an EFL writing class had been investigated during one semester. Thus, this article discussed the students’ responses towards the use of the teaching program. This research study conducted with thirty three students in a private university in Lubuklinggau used a case study by collecting data through a questionnaire and reflective journals. The research results revealed that most of the EFL students had highly positive responses towards the implementation of metacognitive instruction in an EFL writing class including three aspects, namely the learning materials, learning activities, and benefits of the learning processes. Therefore, the teaching program had encouraged and benefited to the students in learning to write.  Metacognitive instruction, as an alternative of effective methods, should be considered by teachers to help their students to become more independent learners.

Keywords: Metacognition, metacognitive instruction, writing

References

Anderson, N. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, EDO-FL-01-10, 1-2.

Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and Good language learners. In C. Griffiths, Lessons from Good language learners (pp.99-110). New York: Cambridge.

Busljeta, R. (2013). Effective use of teaching and learning resources. Czech-Polish historical and pedagogical journal, 5(2), pp.55-69. Retrieved from July 20, 2019 from https://www.ped.muni.cz/cphpjournal/520132/06.pdf

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of foreign language teaching, 1(1), 14-26.

Cher, E. (2019). The Instruction of writing strategies: the effect of the metacognitive strategy on the writing skills of Pupils in secondary education. SAGE Open, 1-17.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Fairbanks, C., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B., He, Y., Levin, B. B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: exploring why some teachers are more thoughfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, January, 161-171.

Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: problems, factors, and suggestions. Journal of education and social sciences, 4(2), pp. 81-92.

Fenghua Lv and Chen, H. (2010). A study of metacognitive-strategies-based writing instruction for vocational college students. English language teaching, 3(3), 136-144.

Fiani, A., Suherdi, D., & Musthofa, B. (2018). The impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL students’ listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness in Lubuklinggau. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 188, pp. 134-140.

Goctu, R. (2017). Metacognitive strategies in Academic writing. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 2(2), 82-95.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink-Chorzempa, B. (2000). Is handwriting casually related to learning to write: treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational psychology, 92, pp.620-633.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp.1-16). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer science + Business Media B.V.

Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2010). Metacognition and strategies instruction in writing. In H. S. Waters & W. Scheneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 226-256). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Hattie, J. A. C. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. London: UK: Routledge.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1992). Models of teaching. New York: Allin and Bacon.

Malik, R. S., & Hamied, F.A. (2014). Research Methods: A Guide for First Time Researchers. Bandung: UPI Press.

Mbato, C. L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners’ self-regulation in reading: implementing a metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context. Unpublished Dissertation. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Permenristekdikti. (2015). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. No. 44, 2015.

Recee, I., & Walker, S. (2007). Teaching, training, and learning (6th Ed.). Sunderland: Business Education Publishers Ltd.

Sardareh, S.A., Saad, M.R.M., & Boroomand, R. (2012). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in pre-university EFL learners. California Linguistic Notes, 37(1), 1-35.

Somaye, S. & Shahla, S. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies with learners’ L2 learning achievement. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning. 5(2), 97-106.

Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.

VanVelzen, J. (2016). Metacognitive learning: advancing learning by developing general knowledge of the learning process. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00049-4.

Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: An expanded view in the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning, 37(4), 573-597.

Wenden, A. (1992). Learner strategies of Learner Autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall.

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515.

Zimmerman, B., and Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing cource attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-31

Issue

Section

Article

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.