Efek Mediasi Kesulitan Keuangan dalam Mendeteksi Corporate Fraud di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v6i1.5576Abstract
Abstract
This study analyzed the mediating effect of financial distress on the research model of the fraud hexagon effect on corporate fraud. The research model in this study was tested using the multiple regression analysis method using 210 companies data collected from companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2015-2019. The originality of this research is to add financial distress as a mediating variable in explaining the effect of fraud hexagon theory on corporate fraud in Indonesia. The results show empirical evidence that financial distress has a significant positive mediating effect in explaining the effect of stimulus on corporate fraud. Financial distress has a significant negative mediating effect in explaining the effect of collusion, opportunity and rationalization on corporate fraud. Financial distress has also been proven to have no mediation effect in explaining the influence of capability and ego on corporate fraud. The test results prove that high financial achievement targets and political connections have lower the risk of experiencing financial distress. Loose supervision and inconsistent implementation of corporate governance can plunge the company into financial distress. These conditions will eventually encourage companies to commit corporate fraud in order to cover up the financial distress they are experiencing.
Keywords: Corporate fraud; Financial distress; Fraud hexagon; F-score; Mediating effect
Â
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menganalisis efek mediasi kesulitan keuangan pada model penelitian pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap corporate fraud. Model penelitian diuji menggunakan metode analisis regresi berganda dengan data 210 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2015-2019. Originalitas penelitian ini adalah menggunakan kesulitan keuangan sebagai variabel mediasi dalam menjelaskan pengaruh teori fraud hexagon terhadap corporate fraud di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bukti empiris bahwa kesulitan keuangan memiliki efek mediasi positif yang signifikan dalam menjelaskan pengaruh variabel stimulus terhadap corporate fraud. Kesulitan keuangan memiliki efek mediasi negatif yang signifikan dalam menjelaskan pengaruh variabel collusion, opportunity dan rationalization terhadap corporate fraud. Kesulitan keuangan juga terbukti tidak memiliki pengaruh mediasi dalam menjelaskan pengaruh variabel capability and ego terhadap corporate fraud. Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa target pencapaian keuangan yang tinggi serta adanya koneksi politik dapat menurunkan resiko perusahaan mengalami kesulitan keuangan. Longgarnya pengawasan dan penerapan tata kelola perusahaan yang tidak konsisten dapat menjerumuskan perusahaan ke dalam kondisi kesulitan keuangan. Kondisi yang mendesak pada akhirnya akan mendorong perusahaan untuk melakukan corporate fraud demi menutupi kondisi kesulitan keuangan yang dialami.
Kata Kunci: Kejahatan perusahaan; Kesulitan keuangan; Fraud hexagon; F-score; Efek mediasi
References
Abdullahi, R., Mansor, N., & Nuhu, M. S. (2015). Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory: Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(28). Retrieved from www.iiste.org
ACPAI. (2019). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. Durham: Association of Certified Public Accountant.
Ahmad, A. H. (2019). What factors discriminate reorganized and delisted distressed firms: Evidence from Malaysia. Finance Research Letters, 29, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.010
Alifiah, M. N. (2014). Prediction of financial distress companies in the trading and services sector in Malaysia using macroeconomic variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.652
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.
Altman, E. I., Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2017). Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman’s Z-Score model. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 28(2), 131–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12053
Anjum, S. (2012). Business bankruptcy prediction models: A significant study of the Altman’s Z-score model. Asian Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2128475
Arroyave, J. (2018). A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of corporate bankruptcy prediction models based on financial ratios: Evidence from Colombia. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071
Bărbuţă-Mişu, N., & Codreanu, E.-S. (2014). Analysis and prediction of the bankruptcy risk in Romanian building sector companies. Ekonomika, 93(2), 131–146.
BDO. (2017). Fraudtrack report. Binder Dijker Otte LLP, (February).
Bollaert, H., & Petit, V. (2010). Beyond the dark side of executive psychology: Current research and new directions. European Management Journal, 28, 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.01.001
Bromiley, P. (2005). The behavioral foundations of strategic management. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2021). Pengumuman daftar notasi khusus. Retrieved July 30, 2021, from https://www.idx.co.id/perusahaan-tercatat/notasi-khusus/
Christian, N., Basri, Y. Z., & Arafah, W. (2019). Analysis of fraud triangle, fraud diamond and fraud pentagon theory to detecting corporate fraud in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(4), 73–78.
CIMA. (2009a). Corporate fraud: Topic gateway series. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, (57).
CIMA. (2009b). Fraud risk management: A guide to good practice. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. The American Journal of Sociology.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Donelson, D. C., McInnis, J., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2016). The effect of governance reforms on financial reporting fraud. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 1, 235–274. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2138348
Gabriel, C. (2018). The rise of kleptocracy: Malaysia’s missing billions. Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0005
Habib, A., Costa, M. D., Huang, H. J., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Sun, L. (2018). Determinants and consequences of financial distress: Review of the empirical literature. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12400
Handoko, B. L. (2021). Fraud hexagon dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud perusahaan perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(2), 176–192. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka
Hasnan, S., Rahman, R. A., & Mahenthiran, S. (2013). Management motive, weak governance, earnings management, and fraudulent financial reporting: malaysian evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-50353
Hung, D. N., Ha, H. T. V., & Binh, D. T. (2017). Application of F-score in predicting fraud, errors: Experimental research in Vietnam. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v7i2.12174
IAPI. (2018). Standar profesional akutan publik. (Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia, Ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Jia, C., Ding, S., Li, Y., & Wu, Z. (2009). Fraud, enforcement action, and the role of corporate governance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0061-9
Jiang, Y., & Jones, S. (2018). Corporate distress prediction in China: A machine learning approach. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12432
Johnson, S. A., Ryan, H. E., & Tian, Y. S. (2009). Managerial incentives and corporate fraud: The sources of incentives matter. Review of Finance, 13, 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfn014
Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Vendrzyk, V. P. (1999). Defense procurement fraud, penalties, and contractor influence. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 809–842. https://doi.org/10.1086/250080
Kets De Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. (1984). Neurotic style and organizational pathology. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050104
Kuhnen, C. M., & Melzer, B. T. (2018). Noncognitive abilities and financial delinquency: The role of self-efficacy in avoiding financial distress. Journal of Finance, 73(6), 2837–2869. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12724
Lokanan, M., & Sharma, S. (2018). A fraud triangle analysis of the LIBOR fraud. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 10(2), 187–212.
Lou, Y. I., & Wang, M. L. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(2), 61–78.
Maccarthy, J. (2017). Using Altman Z-score and Beneish M-score models to detect financial fraud and corporate failure : A case study of Enron Corporation. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(6), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijfa.20170606.01
Mahama, M. (2015). Detecting corporate fraud and financial distress using the Altman and Beneish models the case of Enron Corp. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, III(1), 1–18. Retrieved from http://ijecm.co.uk/
Marks, J. (2012). The mind behind the fraudsters crime: Key behavioral and environmental elements. In ACFE Global Fraud Conference. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
McLain, S., & Tsuneoka, C. (2017, October 13). Kobe Steel Admits 500 Companies Misled in Scandal. Retrieved February 4, 2022, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/kobe-steel-admits-500-companies-misled-in-scandal-1507901631
Mulford, C. W., & Comiskey, E. E. (2011). The financial numbers game detecting creative accounting theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Nelson, S. P. (2012a). Post fraud: An empirical study of firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2(3), 59–065. Retrieved from http://internationalscholarsjournals.org
Nelson, S. P. (2012b). Pre fraud: An empirical in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 4(1).
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1429–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.718
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the ï¬rm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issues), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::aid-smj936>3.3.co;2-b
OJK. Direksi dan dewan komisaris emiten dan perusahaan publik, Pub. L. No. 33/POJK.04/2014, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 21 (2014).
Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224–240.
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968
Pricewaterhousecoopers. (2011). Cybercrime: Protecting against the growing threat. The Global Economic Crime Survey. London.
Pricewaterhousecoopers. (2018). Pulling fraud out of the shadows. Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey. London. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/forensics/global-economic-crime-and-fraud-survey-2018.pdf
Pricewaterhousecoopers. (2020). Fighting fraud: A never-ending battle PwC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2020. London. Retrieved from www.pwc.com/fraudsurvey
Primasari, R. A., & Fidiana. (2020). Whistleblowing berdasarkan intensitas moral, komitmen profesional, dan tingkat keseriusan kecurangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 4(1), 63–77. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/jka
Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. (2018). Fraud pentagon analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting (study on Indonesian capital market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 42(5), 93–109. Retrieved from http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied
Rajasekar, T., Ashraf, S., & Deo, M. (2014). An empirical enquiry on the financial distress of Navratna companies in India. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(3).
Santoso, S. (2020). Panduan Lengkap SPSS 26. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Sarpong, D., Sajdakova, J., & Adams, K. (2019). The Mabey and Johnson bribery scandal: A case of executive hubris. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61, 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21989
Scalzer, R. S., Rodrigues, A., Macedo, M. Ã. da S., & Wanke, P. (2019). Financial distress in electricity distributors from the perspective of Brazilian regulation. Energy Policy, 125, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.018
Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 111–128.
Shin, S. ok. (2020). The rise and fall of Park Geun-hye: the perils of South Korea’s weak party system. Pacific Review, 33(1), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1523804
Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1987.4275905
Singh, B. P., & Mishra, A. K. (2016). Re-estimation and comparisons of alternative accounting based bankruptcy prediction models for Indian companies. Financial Innovation, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0026-9
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics: Corporate Governance and Performance, 13, 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
Sulub, A. S. (2014). Testing the predictive power of Altman’s revised Z’ model: The case of 10 multinational companies. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(21), 174–184. Retrieved from www.iiste.org
Tan, D. A. P., & Utami, I. (2021). Studi eksperimental atas kontrol diri dan gaya hidup : Dampaknya pada niat kecurangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(1), 16–33. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wang, Z., Chen, M. H., Chin, C. L., & Zheng, Q. (2017). Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, XXX(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.004
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal, (December 2014), 38–42. https://doi.org/DOI:
Wu, W., Johan, S. A., & Rui, O. M. (2014). Institutional investors, political connections, and the incidence of regulatory enforcement against corporate fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(4), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2392-4
Yeung, E., & Shen, W. (2019). Can pride be a vice and virtue at work? Associations between authentic and hubristic pride and leadership behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1(20), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2352
Zaki, N. M. (2017). The appropriateness of fraud triangle and diamond models in assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial statements - An empirical study in firms listed in the egyptian stock exchange. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research , 2(2), 2403–2433. Retrieved from www.ijsser.orgwww.ijsser.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.