COMPARING STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES IN AN ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT: DOES ANONYMITY MATTER?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v10i2.7727

Keywords:

attitudes, anonymous peer assessment, identifiable peer assessment, online peer assessment

Abstract

Peer assessment is a fundamental activity aiming to involve students to participate actively in their own learning processes. In the context of EFL online learning, the peer assessment was conducted in the online mode as well. This study aimed to: 1) compare students’ attitudes in doing an online peer assessment in two different conditions of anonymity, 2) explore students’ perceptions of the anonymous and identifiable online peer assessment.  Seventy students of the English language education department in a private university participated in this study. Assigned to two different conditions, i.e anonymous and identifiable online peer assessment, the students were engaged in a Workshop activity, which was an asynchronous Moodle-based online peer assessment. Each student assessed three peers’ works as well as provide feedback comments. A questionnaire with close-ended and open-ended questions was used to investigate the students’ attitudes as well as perceptions of the different peer assessment formats. An independent samples t-test was performed to compare the attitude scores of both groups. The result indicated that students in the anonymous group showed a slightly better attitude compared to those in the identifiable group, yet the difference was not significant (t = 1.164, p > .05). From the questionnaire result, it was also found that the students in the anonymous group had more positive perceptions towards online peer assessment activity. These findings imply that while the anonymous online peer assessment is more favoured by learners, it might not be able to guarantee positive development in students’ overall aspects of attitudes.

References

Adachi, C., Hong-Meng Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775

Ary, D., C.J., L., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Bouziane, A., & Zyad, H. (2018). The impact of self and peer assessment on l2 writing: the case of Moodle Workshops. In In Assessing EFL Writing in the 21st Century Arab World (pp. 111–135). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chen, C. (2010). Computers & education: the implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008

Chen, J. (2021). The effectiveness of peer assessment in EFL blended learning environments. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (1978), 566–568. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456887.3457015

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Elshami, W., & Abdalla, M. E. (2017). Diagnostic radiography students’ perceptions of formative peer assessment within a radiographic technique module. Radiography, 23(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2016.06.001

Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Research trends and applications of technology-supported peer assessment: a review of selected journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00131-x

Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, L., & Nummela, N. (2006). Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z

Topping, K. J (2017). Peer assessment : Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31532/interdiscipeducpsychol.1.1.007

Kilickaya, F. (2017). peer assessment of group members in tertiary contexts. Online Submission, 329–343. Retrieved on September 22, 2022 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED574889&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Kobayashi, M. (2020). Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students’ attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4694

Langan, A. M., Wheater, C. P., Shaw, E. M., Haines, B. J., Cullen, W. R., Boyle, J. C., … Preziosi, R. F. (2005). Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243878

Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746

Lin, G. Y. (2018). Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers and Education, 116, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010

Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x

Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018

Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2

Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100–115.

Lynch, R., McNamara, P. M., & Seery, N. (2012). Promoting deep learning in a teacher education programme through self- and peer-assessment and feedback. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643396

Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1

Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186

Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018). Accountability in peer assessment: examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374

Peterson, C. H., & Peterson, N. A. (2011). Impact of peer evaluation confidentiality on student marks. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050213

Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (2015). Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.823930

Rocklage, M. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2015). The evaluative lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005

Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018). Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8

Samaka, M., Miao, Y., & Wang, D. (2016). Support peer assessment processes in online problem-based learning. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 10-13-Apri(April), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474598

van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002

Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015). What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study. Computers and Education, 81, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001

Wilson, M. J., Diao, M. M., & Huang, L. (2015). ‘I’m not here to learn how to mark someone else’s stuff’:an investigation of an online peer-to-peer review workshop tool. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 15–32.

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Wulandari, I., Purwati, O., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2021). An inquiry into EFL learners’ perceptions of Whatsapp for oral peer assessment. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 9(1), 37–49. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/Perspective/article/view/4502

Yastıbaş, G. Ç., & Yastıbaş, A. E. (2015). The effect of peer feedback on writing anxiety in Turkish EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.543

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-11-15

How to Cite

Acai, F. E., & Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2022). COMPARING STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES IN AN ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT: DOES ANONYMITY MATTER?. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 10(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v10i2.7727

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the works' authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Upon receiving the proofs, the Author/Editor agrees to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.
  4. Authors should submit the signed copyright transfer agreement form (CTA Form) along with the checked (and corrected proofs).

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.