Peran perilaku kerja inovatif dan keterlibatan kerja dosen vokasi di Jawa Timur

Authors

  • Nilawati Fiernaningsih Politeknik Negeri Malang, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-8416
  • Pudji Herijanto Politeknik Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Anna Widayani Akademi Komunitas Negeri Putra Sang Fajar Blitar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jibm.v6i2.7524

Keywords:

Innovative work behavior, Work engagement, Employee Performance

Abstract

Abstract. Lecturers are one of the resources that play a very important role in achieving higher education goals. Performance from lecturers is essential for organizational development and for the success of higher education. A vocational public university in the province of East Java is the subject of this study, which intends to investigate the effects of innovative behavior and workplace involvement on the effectiveness of teaching staff. The sample in this study was 316 people taken by proportional random sampling method. SEM-PLS data analysis is the quantitative methodology used in this investigation. According to the study's findings, work engagement significantly influences innovative work behavior. Additionally, innovative work behavior conduct has a big impact on how well employees succeed. Finally, employee performance is significantly impacted by work engagement.

 

Keywords:  Innovative work behavior; Work engagement; Employee Performance.

 

Abstrak. Dosen merupakan salah satu sumber daya yang memegang peranan sangat berarti dalam mencapai tujuan perguruan tinggi. Dalam pengembangan organisasi, kinerja dosen sangat diperlukan buat keberhasilan pendidikan tinggi. Studi ini bertujuan buat mengkaji peran perilaku inovatif serta keterlibatan kerja terhadap kinerja staf dosen di suatu perguruan tinggi negeri vokasi di provinsi Jawa Timur. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 316 orang diambil dengan metode proportional random sampling. Riset ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis informasi SEM- PLS. Hasil pada penelitian ini menampilkan bahwa work engagement mempengaruhi signifikan terhadap perilaku inovatif kerja. Selain itu, perilaku kerja inovatif memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Terakhir, keterlibatan kerja memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan.

 

Katakunci:  Perilaku Kerja Inovatif; Keterlibatan Kerja; Kinerja Karyawan.

 

Author Biographies

Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Politeknik Negeri Malang

Dosen Politeknik Negeri Malang

Pudji Herijanto, Politeknik Negeri Malang

Dosen Politeknik Negeri Malang

Anna Widayani, Akademi Komunitas Negeri Putra Sang Fajar Blitar

Dosen Akademi Komunitas Negeri Putra Sang Fajar Blitar

References

Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Promoting thriving at work and waning turnover intention: A relational perspective. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2016.08.001

Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0008

Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063

Andayani, D., Kabalmay, S., Resandi, R., & Darmawan, D. (2010). Pemberdayaan Karyawan Berbasis Keunggulan Bersaing. Inti Presindo Pustaka, Bandung.

Bernardin, H.J. and Russell, J. E. (1993). Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77(June 2018), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.014

Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: implications for innovative behaviors at work. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual p. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.tcsedsystem.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=762314f7-db10-45ee-b18f-6de541ad2ea1%40sessionmgr4009

Chughtai, A. A. (2008). Impact of Job Involvement on In-Role Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. 192.

Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004

Dhar, S. G. R. (2017). Employee Service Innovative Behavior : The Roles of Leader-Member Exchange ( LMX ), Work. Lmx.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512

Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Passion for work: Work engagement versus workaholism. Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806374.00030

Groselj Matej, Matej Cerne, S. P. and B. G. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour : the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0294

Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation.

Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. R. (2007). A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x

Isen, A. M. (2001). An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations: Theoretical Issues with Practical Implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276601750408311

Janssen, O. (2000a). Job demands , perceptions of e V ort – reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. 287–302.

Janssen, O. (2000b). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Kim, C., Zhao, W., & Yang, K. H. (2008). An empirical study on the integrated framework of e-CRM in online shopping: Evaluating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and trust based on customers’ perspectives. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 6(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2008070101

Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Z. (2017). Proactive Personality and Innovative Work Behavior: the Mediating Effects of Affective States and Creative Self-Efficacy in Teachers. Current Psychology, 36(4), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9457-8

Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2005). “Evaluasi kinerja SDM.†Tiga Serangkai.

Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164

Porath, C., SPREITZER, G., GIBSON, C., & GARNETT, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/job

Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2115

Rivai, V. and Basri, A. F. M. (2005). Performance Appraisal: Sistem Yang Tepat Menilai Kinerja Pegawai Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model Of Individual Innovation In The Workplace. Academy of ManagemenI Loumal, 37(3), 580–607.

Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A., Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants Of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model Of Individual Innovation In The Workplace. Choice Reviews Online, 32(03), 32-1325-32–1325. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-1325

Siahaan, E., Gultom, P., & Lumbanraja, P. (2016). Improvement of employee banking performance based on competency improvement and placement working through career development (case study in Indonesia). In International Business Management (Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 255–261). https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2016.255.261

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Zhou, J. and Shalley, C. E. (2008). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Fiernaningsih, N., Herijanto, P., & Widayani, A. (2023). Peran perilaku kerja inovatif dan keterlibatan kerja dosen vokasi di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.33603/jibm.v6i2.7524

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.